Find My Siblings!
4 posts by 2 authors in: Forums > CMS Builder
Last Post: June 1, 2012 (RSS)
By Perchpole - May 31, 2012
Hello, All -
I'm putting togeter some code with which I want to return the number(s) of all the siblings related to the $selectedCategory.
If I wanted to find the parent I would do this:
Can I do something equally simple to return the siblings?
:0)
Perch
I'm putting togeter some code with which I want to return the number(s) of all the siblings related to the $selectedCategory.
If I wanted to find the parent I would do this:
<?php $parentCategory = mysql_get("category", $selectedCategory['parentNum']); ?>
Can I do something equally simple to return the siblings?
:0)
Perch
Re: [Perchpole] Find My Siblings!
By Dave - June 1, 2012
Hi Perch,
Have you seen the getCategories() function and review all it's options? It does a lot of this for you when you need to create nested menus, etc.
Otherwise, if you need to do something not supported by that here's some (untested) code:
Let me know if that works for you.
Have you seen the getCategories() function and review all it's options? It does a lot of this for you when you need to create nested menus, etc.
Otherwise, if you need to do something not supported by that here's some (untested) code:
$siblingWhere = "parent = '" .mysql_escape($selectedCategory['parentNum']). "'";
$siblingWhere .= " AND num != '" .mysql_escape($selectedCategory['num']). "'";
$siblingCategories = mysql_select('category', $siblingWhere);
Let me know if that works for you.
Dave Edis - Senior Developer
interactivetools.com
interactivetools.com
Re: [Dave] Find My Siblings!
By Perchpole - June 1, 2012
H, Dave -
Thanks for the code.
My sites tend to be underpinned by a core set-up of getRecords() calls. In addition to this, if a page design requires some kind of special code, which I can't invoke from my core getRecords() calls, I try to rely on the kind of small "snippets" you've just given me above.
My reasoning for this is that I "assume" all getRecords calls are pretty heavy in terms of overhead. I feel I should avoid using any more than I have to unless absolutely necessary (a last resort).
I'm also uncomfortable about using loops to filter through a 100+ records in the hope of matching just one or two! Again, my assumption is that this would be a waste of resources.
Now, of course, I might be completely wrong - but I'm keen to learn!
:0)
Perch
Thanks for the code.
My sites tend to be underpinned by a core set-up of getRecords() calls. In addition to this, if a page design requires some kind of special code, which I can't invoke from my core getRecords() calls, I try to rely on the kind of small "snippets" you've just given me above.
My reasoning for this is that I "assume" all getRecords calls are pretty heavy in terms of overhead. I feel I should avoid using any more than I have to unless absolutely necessary (a last resort).
I'm also uncomfortable about using loops to filter through a 100+ records in the hope of matching just one or two! Again, my assumption is that this would be a waste of resources.
Now, of course, I might be completely wrong - but I'm keen to learn!
:0)
Perch
Re: [Perchpole] Find My Siblings!
By Dave - June 1, 2012
Hi Perch,
That makes sense. Hope the code I provided helps.
getRecords() does have a bit of overhead, but servers are generally very fast. There's always the balance between programmer hours and server resources. I usually code whatever is easiest and then optimize later if there's a need due to constraints on server resources.
The biggest problem people run into is loading too many records into memory and processing them in PHP instead of Mysql, or calling a mysql query in a loop.
If you'd like to get some feedback from time to time on different ways to do things or if there's a more efficent way, feel free to post.
Cheers!
That makes sense. Hope the code I provided helps.
getRecords() does have a bit of overhead, but servers are generally very fast. There's always the balance between programmer hours and server resources. I usually code whatever is easiest and then optimize later if there's a need due to constraints on server resources.
The biggest problem people run into is loading too many records into memory and processing them in PHP instead of Mysql, or calling a mysql query in a loop.
If you'd like to get some feedback from time to time on different ways to do things or if there's a more efficent way, feel free to post.
Cheers!
Dave Edis - Senior Developer
interactivetools.com
interactivetools.com